Squeaky Bum Time

The email goes out on a Friday afternoon, because Friday afternoons are when emails like this go out.

Travel freeze. Client entertainment paused until further notice. The role you were about to fill no longer a role. No more freelancers. Do everything you can to convert the pipeline. Sort out your POs. Bring project revenue into 2026…

It is signed by someone senior, it thanks everyone for their continued focus, and it does not contain the word “results”.

Everybody who receives it knows what it is. I have received it, and at one time I have signed it.

It is squeaky bum time.

In July, in The Standing Gallop, I wrote that a reported growth number is not a fact of nature. It is the product of definitional choices. From this week the choices start arriving as we begin the Q3 reporting cycle for the holdcos. Publicis reports tomorrow. Omnicom, WPP and dentsu follow over the next three weeks.

First, WTF is “squeaky bum time”?

Sir Alex Ferguson, then manager of Man United, said it in March 2003, in the last weeks of a title race with Arsenal. He was not describing his own nerves. He was transferring them: Arsenal had a cup replay, then a semi-final, then United. It was mind games, and it worked well enough that the phrase entered the dictionary.

Collins defines it as the tense final stages of a league competition, especially from the point of view of the leaders. The Oxford English Dictionary adds the physical detail: the sound of someone shifting restlessly on plastic seating.

Picture the seat. Not the leather of the directors’ box. The moulded plastic of the stand, cold through your coat, built for sitting on and nobody is sitting on it. You are perched on the front two inches, every muscle clenched, and every time the ball moves you move with it, and the seat squeaks. Not once. Every pass. Every clearance. Every minute the clock refuses to run down. It is the sound of a result that has not been decided yet, in a season with no time left to recover from a mistake. Every movement matters because there are so few movements left. That is the clench, and it only comes when the thing could go either way.

That is also a fair description of a holding-company results release in October.

Half-year results get the attention. Full-year results get the headlines. The third quarter gets a shrug, and it is the one I have always read most closely, because it is the quarter that decides the year while there is still a year left to decide.

By the end of September a holding company knows three things. It knows what the year’s revenue will be within a point, because Q4 media is largely committed and Q4 fees are largely scoped. It knows which pitches have landed and which have not. And it knows, to the person, what it costs to run the fourth quarter.

The gap between those three is the memo. If the gap is wide, the memo is a travel ban, a hiring freeze and an instruction to pull every signable scope into the current year. If the gap is narrow, the memo doesn’t get sent, and nobody notices the quarter at all.

Q3 is seasonally soft everywhere; August is a dead month in Europe and a slower one in America. A cost freeze in October is sometimes nothing more than prudent housekeeping ahead of a big quarter. And real wins do land in Q3 (Publicis, by trade reports, added PepsiCo and LVMH without a pitch).

But the memo is a forecast. It tells you what the results will say before the results are published, and it tells you in a currency that doesn’t need adjusting: flights, conferences, headcount, invoices. Read the results backwards from the memo and the mechanisms fall out one by one. No travel is margin. No backfill is the labour synergy. Convert every pitch this year is revenue recognition and the net-new-business table. The numbers that follow are the companies’ own.

Clients are also having their own squeaky bum time, and I will keep it short because it is not the story. They front-weighted the year, the questions about whether the first half earned it have arrived, and the festive season is being bought against inflation that has not gone away. You are anxious. So you ring your agency: can the media flex, can the commitment come down (or alternatively is there anything opportunistic for a brand prepared to lean in).

Now sit in the agency’s seat, because that call lands in October, and October is when every holding company does the same thing. The quarter is closed. The gap is known. And the whole organisation switches, almost overnight, to what I used to call controlling the controllables.

Here is what the spreadsheet cannot see. The uncontrollable outcome of controlling the controllables. If your people are not travelling, they are not with their clients. If they are not walking the floors of the conferences and gatherings, they are not in the rooms where next year’s briefs are being shaped. If they are not out with their own teams, the conversions you need to carry into next year like the renewals, the scope expansions and the pitches that are won on relationships before they are won on chemistry meetings are all weaker for it.

Every October cost control is a choice of control over trust. It saves a quarter and taxes the one after.

So if you are a client, there is one question worth asking your agency this month, and it is not about your account. It is: what cost controls do you have in place right now, over and above the normal running of the business? (I have been told about a number of these extra controls in place at the moment, but these are for you to ask the truth of your own partners.)

The answer tells you about their confidence in the year, their momentum, whether they trust their people, and whether their people trust their leaders. Those controls describe the business your team is operating inside. A team on the cusp of a bonus behaves very differently from a team that already knows the bonus pool is thin this year, and you will feel the difference long before you can name it.

Last December, when Omnicom announced 4,000 cuts in the holiday season, I wrote this: “The people who will really suffer? Those who survive this round, work twice as hard covering departed colleagues, watch client service deteriorate, and then get eliminated in Q3 2026 into a market with fewer options and more competition.” Q3 2026 is now the quarter being reported. In March Omnicom confirmed synergies of $1.5 billion, a billion of it from labour, and a target headcount of 105,000 by mid-2028, taking 15,000 more roles. The industry’s natural churn runs at about 20% a year, so most of that needs no announcement at all. It needs a hiring freeze, which is to say it needs the memo.

The same logic runs through the others. WPP cut staff incentives by half in 2025 and is now trying to rebuild them while the balance sheet carries £2.9 billion of net debt. dentsu’s promise that no international market will be loss-making by end-2027 is, as I wrote in August, a sorting instruction: every market has a tag on its door. And the thing nobody says out loud about new business is that it does not lift the freeze. In July I wrote that in agency economics the win is a cost centre before it is a client while the team is hired ahead of the revenue, the transition is absorbed and the first year has been priced to win the pitch. A good Q3 for new business is, in the short run, a worse Q3 for cash.

Four quarters of that is not a cost programme. It is a culture. The person who leaves in November is not replaced, the three who cover the gap burn through the spring, the client notices by summer. If you work inside a holding company, the results are not a report on where the business was. They are the weather forecast for your work-life balance.

Publicis prints inside its 4.5–5% guide, below last year’s 5.7%, and the release will say so plainly because it has twenty-one consecutive quarters of outperformance to point at instead. They achieve this mechanically through conversions in the past still now flowing through the pipes so it is real, organic, net growth.

Omnicom reports a strong headline on its gross basis and a third consecutive decline in the advertising discipline. Who knows what the real numbers are. Their shareholders don’t look that closely it seems. Wren still has a little longer to go before he can take his pot of gold and leave the creaking artifice behind him for others. The perimeter widens again. Synergies are “ahead of plan”, which means headcount. If there is full-year ‘organic’ guidance for the first time, read which businesses it excludes.

WPP reports a narrower decline than the first half and calls it momentum. It is a base effect; the first half of 2025 was the worst in the company’s history. The Phase 1 tests are positive net new business and £250 million of savings; the savings will pass, and net new business will be claimed again through mainly retentions.

dentsu reports Japan growing and all three international regions shrinking, and the first interim reading of the tags: at least one market quietly closed or sold. The organic line will be within a point of zero, and the word “stable” will do a lot of work.

One of the four, maybe two, announces a further efficiency programme under a name that is not “restructuring”. The valley between the integrated players and the specialists is not filling. It is widening, and the memo is what widening feels like from inside.

I could be wrong about any of these, and the point of writing them down is to find out which. What would change my mind is a holding company that reports growth on the basis everyone else uses, with the advertising discipline growing, and no memo.

Ferguson’s phrase survived because it was true twice over. The leader feels it most, and the leader says it to make someone else feel it. For the next three weeks every release you read will be doing the second thing. Your job, from whichever seat you are in, is to notice the first.

I’ll be on the calls. I’ll write up each one as it lands, and when the last of them is in we will come back to this page and see how many of the four I got right, and whether the memo said what I said it would.

It is the sound of a result that has not been decided yet, in a season with no time left to recover from a mistake.

So, from your squeaking seat, whether client, agency, or somewhere in between, what is the one number in this month’s prints that would change what you do before Christmas?

Brandflow is read twice weekly by senior marketing and agency leaders, written by someone who has sat on every side of this table. It now lives here at brandflow-marketing.com with the full archive, searchable, free.